The Sub Burndown

Saturday December 26, 2015



Section 1
- The Sub Fire -


6 Minutes With The Arsonist
Incendiary #1 — The timeline of initial events that sparked suspicion of arson.
Keep reading →
Fire Investigation Never Done
Cover-up of The Sub Fire started two days later…
Keep reading →
SLO City FD Failure to Evacuate
Clearing the building and ensuring nobody is inside - a crucial step neglected by the SLO City FD.
Keep reading →
No R.I.T. or F.A.S.T Crew Assigned
BC-1 Berryman not only did not assign a R.I.T./F.A.S.T. crew, he put his command post where the fire did eventually burn to…
Keep reading →
The Sub Fire Load & Interior Details
Store inventory and layout tells a different tale...
Keep reading →
Sub Roof Details
The Sub and SDRS had a complete recent earthquake upgrade...to achieve a one-hour Class A roof fire rating.
Keep reading →
Seven Paths To Enter & Fight The Fire At The Sub
The Sub was unique in how many ways it would have been easy to fight a fire.
Keep reading →
Burning A Building Down Is Not Firefighting
You can't put a structure fire out with chainsaws.
Keep reading →
Unknown Incendiary Device #2
Our assertion is that all evidence points to UID #2, having been ignited on top of The Sub.
Keep reading →
See How the Fire Moved Through the Structures

Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative Supplement of San Luis Obispo City Fire Department Captain/Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall

First, note his report was not written until January 6th, over ten days after the fire.

It was not written immediately after the fire which is SLO City FD policy.

Marshall claims that when he opened the rear door, and sliding door at 100 Pismo Street, thick black smoke came out. This was not when he opened the sliding door. If it were true, SLO City FD would not have taken the time to remove the two fixtures from the beaded curtain room [see photo: removed merchandise]. Before the fixtures were taken away, BC-1 Berryman had already declared it defensive and they were not allowed to go in. Neither pictures, nor evidence, physically support the claim of thick black smoke [see video: 100 Pismo Street doors/no black smoke]. It was not true for most of the remainder of the fire. The "thick black smoke" statement is an intentional "distortion" told to help excuse not actually fighting the fire. At one point early in the fire, a fireman goes into the beaded curtain room without bothering to put his mask on - certainly not a thick, black smoke scenario [see video: fireman going in].

By forcing these doors open before anyone even thought of an actual ventilation plan, the active unburned parts of the fire were sucked further into the store. To the right of The Sub's front door, sap on the post and some merchandise caught fire. If the doors had stayed closed until the hose teams in front or rear were ready to put out the fire above the window box, it is likely no fire would have gotten into the main room and no merchandise would have been burning.

Marshall actually claims they put a 2-1/2" fire hose through the rear door at 100 Pismo Street, (it looks like a 1-3/4" hose), but then claims that there was a partial collapse of the ceiling at the rear of the building (which was not yet on fire and would have zero chance of naturally collapsing) [see video/photo: rear area/no efforts being made]. No fire hose ever went in through the door and the ceiling could not yet be collapsed or collapsing unless it was collapsed by the actions of the roof crew (chainsaws) and the master streams (4" of water) driving down through the holes. This portion of the structure did not catch fire for more than 90 minutes after Marshall's statement. This portion of The Sub is the furthest point in the main building from the start of the fire.



If the loft over the rear door was partially collapsed early in the fire, it was by a combination of poorly considered roof cuts and master streams through the openings that were cut. If a stream came down on top of the loft, it could have partially collapsed one corner to a height of 6+ feet. Still ample space to go in, and not caused by fire, but by firemen and fire water streams.

Even though it was untrue that they weren't able to go into The Sub's 100 Pismo Street exit door, the sliding door right next to it was also an entry point into a room on the other side of a firewall. This room had an 8' wide by 7' tall portal into the main room that could have easily been used for entry and for safe firefighting, without entering the main room. If the loft was partially fallen, it would not have blocked this opening.

An interior attack could have also been conducted by going into the cut open doors in 283 Higuera Street (blacklight room) and water could have been put on any part of The Sub's main interior through the 36" wide doorway behind a 13" masonry firewall - a totally safe location to put water onto the fire from.

The statement about the partial ceiling collapse, (we had no ceilings only undersides of roofs), is at least different than the lie Chief Olson told owner, Richard Ferris, at the scene. Olson claimed the water on the roof caused the walls to shift and he was afraid to get near. Ferris explained to Chief Olson that they had just completed a full earthquake retrofit upgrade and the roof and walls were totally sound. With the walls soundly standing after the fire, we are not surprised that Marshall was drafted late in the game to fill in some narrative to try and make the unreasonable seem reasonable.

Section 2
- Square Deal Recordings & Supplies (SDRS) Fire -


The Sub Office Fire Proves Fire Did Not Come into Front of SDRS from The Sub through the Firewall Between the Two Businesses

The Sub/ SDRS Corp.© stands to prove the fire did not come into front of SDRS through the firewall of The Sub
Keep reading →
Unknown Incendiary Device #3 in SDRS

How did the fire go from The Sub to the front of Square Deal Recordings & Supplies when the fire was out in the portion of The Sub adjoining the front of Square Deal before the fire started in the front of Square Deal?
Keep reading →
SDRS Fire Load Notes

The SLO City FD leadership has repeatedly stated we had a huge fire load at Square Deal Recordings & Supplies. This is relatively untrue and totally untrue from the perspective of the two hours they had to stop the fire that was not yet in our building or prevent it from entering Square Deal.
Full document →
11 Basic Stop Points for Preventing Fire Spread into SDRS from Rear

11 basic stop points for preventing fire spread into Square Deal Recordings & Supplies from the rear (Pismo Street)
Full document →
Hole Map Illustration

Holes cut by members of SLO City FD and incendiary devices placed by unknown person(s)
Full document →

Section 3
- San Luis Obispo City Fire Department (SLO City FD) Issues -


SLOCF Fire Calls 2009-2016
History of success rate in San Luis Obispo fires.
Full document →
SLOCF Press Release Corrections
These are what we believe to be factual corrections to SLOCF Chief Garret Olson's press release…
Full document →
Bravest Act or a Cowardly, Evil Act?
Cutting holes in roofs is something firemen do but most civilians can't tell...
Full document →
Is BC-1 Berryman an Arsonist?
In evaluating the actions of Berryman, we have come to the following realizations...
Full document →
Total Destruction is a Job Well Done
Total destruction considered a job well done because no fireman was injured.
Full document →
SLOCF Fails to Follow Own Rules
We will state the appropriate rule from the current SLOCF manual and then what SLOCF actually did.
Full document →
SLOCF Underground "Burndown" Policy
SLOCF leadership seems to have an underground policy of refusing to go into buildings that are on fire.
Full document →
Is SLOCF Corrupt?
While none of these indicators singularly means corruption, a Fire Department guilty of most of these practices is certainly suspect, if not corrupt.
Full document →
How Can You Believe…?
Fire departments who fight few fires do not easily gain experience... There are three ways to deal with this…
Full document →

Firefighter Rules And Guidelines

The basis for the comments in this writing is taken from Firefighter's Rules of Engagement, the San Francisco Fire Department Ventilation Manual, and San Luis Obispo City Fire Emergency Operations Manual. These are standards that SLO City FD supposedly uses.

Below is a copy of the original narrative statement given by the San Luis Obispo City Fire Department Captain Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall regarding the fires at both the The Sub and Square Deal Recordings and Supplies, which took place on December 26, 2015 in downtown San Luis Obispo, California.

To download/save/print, please click here.



Section 4
- Comments, Observations and Correction on Narratives by SLO City FD -


Preamble to Narratives
The overall situation with the SLOCF narratives is that they seem to be an attempt to cover up gross negligence, professional malfeasance, and cowardice…
Keep reading →
SLOCF Battalion Chief-A Neal Berryman
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Battalion Chief-A Neal Berryman
Keep reading →
SLOCF Deputy Chief Jeff Gater
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Deputy Chief Jeff Gater
Keep reading →
SLOCF Chief Garret Olson
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Chief Garret Olson
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Michael King
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Michael King
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Mark Vasquez
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Mark Vasquez
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Matt Callahan
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Matt Callahan
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain-Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain-Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall
Keep reading →