The Sub Burndown

Saturday December 26, 2015



Section 1
- The Sub Fire -


6 Minutes With The Arsonist
Incendiary #1 — The timeline of initial events that sparked suspicion of arson.
Keep reading →
Fire Investigation Never Done
Cover-up of The Sub Fire started two days later…
Keep reading →
SLO City FD Failure to Evacuate
Clearing the building and ensuring nobody is inside - a crucial step neglected by the SLO City FD.
Keep reading →
No R.I.T. or F.A.S.T Crew Assigned
BC-1 Berryman not only did not assign a R.I.T./F.A.S.T. crew, he put his command post where the fire did eventually burn to…
Keep reading →
The Sub Fire Load & Interior Details
Store inventory and layout tells a different tale...
Keep reading →
Sub Roof Details
The Sub and SDRS had a complete recent earthquake upgrade...to achieve a one-hour Class A roof fire rating.
Keep reading →
Seven Paths To Enter & Fight The Fire At The Sub
The Sub was unique in how many ways it would have been easy to fight a fire.
Keep reading →
Burning A Building Down Is Not Firefighting
You can't put a structure fire out with chainsaws.
Keep reading →
Unknown Incendiary Device #2
Our assertion is that all evidence points to UID #2, having been ignited on top of The Sub.
Keep reading →

Cabo San Luis Fire

Preliminary notes on the investigation:

  1. Building was NOT on fire when SLO City FD arrived — It was only under the deck on the pilings below.
  2. Fire was started by a "homeless" person near the middle of the property under the pilings (which create a space with 8'+ clearance).
  3. BC-1 Neal Berryman was in charge.
  4. SLO City FD arrived fairly quickly.
  5. BC-1 Berryman delayed and delayed, a full 30 minutes, until the fire burning on the pilings under the building got up into the structure.
  6. BC-1 Berryman then cut holes in the roof but did no coordinated interior attack, so of course, the fire destroyed and gutted most of the initial restaurant building.
  7. BC-1 Berryman and City Fire Marshal Roger Maggio called the fire ARSON by an unknown person, even through they knew about the homeless person. Rodger Maggio told the victims' attorney that, "there was no excuse for BC-1 Berryman to let the fire get up into the restaurant." When the attorney asked what could be done about it, Maggio chuckled and said, "Sue the Fire Department."
  8. No follow-up investigation looking for the arsonist was conducted. No actual arson investigation was done because they knew it was not arson.

The "official narratives" of the event tell a totally different story:

  1. SLO City FD arrived to a fire which was well underway upstairs on the outside wall of Cabo San Luis.
  2. There is no mention that it started under the pier by a homeless or other unknown person.
  3. There is no mention of the 30-minute delay in taking action against the fire.
  4. SLO City FD cut holes in roofs, and did "their best", but lost most of the area on fire in the process.
  5. The cause is called arson by flammable agent upstairs on an outside wall of Cabo San Luis — this means no outsider can review the "investigation" that never took place.
  6. All narratives are brief and barely informative.
  7. Narratives refer you to the Fire Marshal's report for full details.
  8. The Fire Marshal's report is missing (according to our first PRA request on this subject).
    There is no mention of the 30-minute delay in taking action against the fire. This was Rodger Maggio's first report on his own.



Section 2
- Square Deal Recordings & Supplies (SDRS) Fire -


The Sub Office Fire Proves Fire Did Not Come into Front of SDRS from The Sub through the Firewall Between the Two Businesses

The Sub/ SDRS Corp.© stands to prove the fire did not come into front of SDRS through the firewall of The Sub
Keep reading →
Unknown Incendiary Device #3 in SDRS

How did the fire go from The Sub to the front of Square Deal Recordings & Supplies when the fire was out in the portion of The Sub adjoining the front of Square Deal before the fire started in the front of Square Deal?
Keep reading →
SDRS Fire Load Notes

The SLO City FD leadership has repeatedly stated we had a huge fire load at Square Deal Recordings & Supplies. This is relatively untrue and totally untrue from the perspective of the two hours they had to stop the fire that was not yet in our building or prevent it from entering Square Deal.
Full document →
11 Basic Stop Points for Preventing Fire Spread into SDRS from Rear

11 basic stop points for preventing fire spread into Square Deal Recordings & Supplies from the rear (Pismo Street)
Full document →
Hole Map Illustration

Holes cut by members of SLO City FD and incendiary devices placed by unknown person(s)
Full document →

Section 3
- San Luis Obispo City Fire Department (SLO City FD) Issues -


SLOCF Fire Calls 2009-2016
History of success rate in San Luis Obispo fires.
Full document →
SLOCF Press Release Corrections
These are what we believe to be factual corrections to SLOCF Chief Garret Olson's press release…
Full document →
Bravest Act or a Cowardly, Evil Act?
Cutting holes in roofs is something firemen do but most civilians can't tell...
Full document →
Is BC-1 Berryman an Arsonist?
In evaluating the actions of Berryman, we have come to the following realizations...
Full document →
Total Destruction is a Job Well Done
Total destruction considered a job well done because no fireman was injured.
Full document →
SLOCF Fails to Follow Own Rules
We will state the appropriate rule from the current SLOCF manual and then what SLOCF actually did.
Full document →
SLOCF Underground "Burndown" Policy
SLOCF leadership seems to have an underground policy of refusing to go into buildings that are on fire.
Full document →
Is SLOCF Corrupt?
While none of these indicators singularly means corruption, a Fire Department guilty of most of these practices is certainly suspect, if not corrupt.
Full document →
How Can You Believe…?
Fire departments who fight few fires do not easily gain experience... There are three ways to deal with this…
Full document →



NEXT STORY

Read more




Johnson Avenue Fire

Case Study: 1502 Johnson Avenue 3/4/2012

Ladder truck T-1 responded first but even though they carry 300 gallons of water, San Luis Obispo City Fire Department's ladder truck crew doesn't ever try to put water quickly on fires. T-1 waits until it's time to go up on the roof and cut roof holes before taking action.

Mike King's Written Narrative (T-1) Claims:

Fully involved building with people interior. Both floors with heavy smoke and flames on Side A, B, and D! And attic vents. Engine 3 attacks fire on Side A from outside.

A non-coordinated interior attack is done on Side B, E-4 was assigned as the R.I.C./F.A.S.T. personnel. The attack puts the fire on the ground floor out in corner A/B. T-1 cuts ventilation holes (vertical on Side B/C corner roof). B/C is opposite from the ground floor fire on in A/B and is as far away from the attic fire on Side D as possible. Fire now accelerates and moves toward new vent hole – No coordinated interior attack. Building declared defensive after all people are out because once roof hole is cut and the fire is accelerated, the structure was now too dangerous.

They then put water on outer walls until roof burned through. Then SLO City FD used the "aerial master stream" (overhead hose on ladder truck T-1) through the burned roof to put the fire out.

Samuel Fox's Narrative (E-3) Claims:

Partially involved structure with heavy smoke and fire showing both floors of Side A and a door on Side B.

This is the door they attacked the fire through.

E-3 crew found "heavy activity" fire on Side D of the attic. Instead of cutting a vent hole near the fire and putting the fire out, SLO City FD cut the hole on the far side away from the Side D fire to pull the fire through the attic to Side B and burn the roof through so they can use the aerial hose on T-1 to put the fire out after destroying the building.

In Conclusion:

Depending on whose narration you believe, the house was on fire both floors Side A (front) and a door on Side B (Fire Capt./PM Fox) OR on fire both floors Side A, B, & D (not the back) as well as attic vents (Fire Capt. King).

They attacked the fire (interior) on Side B, sprayed water on Side A (exterior).

Then they cut large holes in roof corner B/C (vertical ventilation) to pull the fire into the one portion of the structure not yet involved in the fire. [Heavy fire was noted in attic on Side D (Fox)].

Once the vertical ventilation focused the fire on the hole and started to accelerate the fire, all firemen were pulled out and then, when the roof burned through, they used the overhead ladder trucks to put out the fire.

This fire is another example of what is now San Luis Obispo City Fire Department's standard operating procedure for a fast safe burn.

They could have put the fire out and saved most the structure but they chose not to.


Section 4
- Comments, Observations and Correction on Narratives by SLO City FD -


Preamble to Narratives
The overall situation with the SLOCF narratives is that they seem to be an attempt to cover up gross negligence, professional malfeasance, and cowardice…
Keep reading →
SLOCF Battalion Chief-A Neal Berryman
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Battalion Chief-A Neal Berryman
Keep reading →
SLOCF Deputy Chief Jeff Gater
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Deputy Chief Jeff Gater
Keep reading →
SLOCF Chief Garret Olson
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Chief Garret Olson
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Michael King
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Michael King
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Mark Vasquez
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Mark Vasquez
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Matt Callahan
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Matt Callahan
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain-Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain-Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall
Keep reading →